The Drake exposed video leak stirred notable discussions on Twitter/X this Tuesday (6 February), unrelated to his musical exploits.

Is the Drake exposed video leak real?

The alleged leaked footage, speculated to be fake, purportedly shows the Canadian artist in a compromising position, which has since gone viral. Kick streamer Adin Ross, known for his previous work with 37-year-old Drake, addressed the issue by sending the artist a voice memo about the Drake exposed video leak.

Bobbi Athoff leaks remind us the dangers of deepfake videos

In a social media snippet of this memo, Ross is heard reacting to the content with surprise and humor, acknowledging Drake’s multifaceted blessings, including a humorous reference to his physique. Drake reportedly responded with levity, texting back with a string of laughing emojis and playfully suggesting he might feature Ross’s voice in his upcoming album intro.

The artist has remained silent on the purported Drake exposed video leak, which, according to Ross and others, might have been filmed aboard his private jet. This incident follows closely on the heels of another controversy where pornographic deepfake images of Taylor Swift were disseminated across X, flouting the platform’s policies against such content.

These nonconsensual images, seemingly crafted with AI technology, depicted the pop icon in sexually explicit scenarios. Reports from the US media highlight that some posts featuring these images garnered over 27 million views and 260,000 likes within just 19 hours, leading to the suspension of the responsible account.

• Explicit language used in the below video:

Drake responds to Adin Ross after he left a voice message about his leaked video… 💀 pic.twitter.com/M9nH9xYzDa

— Liutauras (@Liutauras_) February 6, 2024

“Drake meat leak” is not the first celebrity deepfake case

In response to the uproar, X temporarily halted searches for Swift’s name. Joe Benarroch, the social media company’s head of business operations, described this measure to the Wall Street Journal as a “temporary action,” taken “with an abundance of caution” to underscore the platform’s commitment to safety regarding this matter. X has explicitly stated that posting such material is “strictly prohibited,” affirming its “zero-tolerance policy” against it. While not directly naming Swift, the company announced its proactive efforts in eliminating all identified images and sanctioning the accounts that circulated them.

AI-created deepfake Biden calls target voters

X is diligently monitoring to promptly deal with any further breaches, ensuring the offensive content is swiftly removed. Their statement underscores a steadfast dedication to fostering a safe and respectful online environment for every user.

How these kind of leaks happen?

Incidents like the Drake exposed video leak often occur through various means, and while each situation may be unique, there are several common ways in which such content can become public:

• Hacking: Unauthorized access to personal files through hacking is a common cause of private content leaks. Celebrities’ phones or cloud storage accounts can be targeted, and sensitive content can be stolen and then distributed.
• Unauthorized recording: Sometimes an individual may be recorded without their consent, particularly with today’s technology where cameras are ubiquitous. This content can then be leaked online.
• Accidental uploads: In some cases, a video might be accidentally uploaded to a public platform or sent to someone unintentionally due to human error.
• Insider leaks: Trust can be betrayed when someone close to the individual, who has access to private content, intentionally leaks it to the public or press.
• Deepfakes and misinformation: With advances in AI and machine learning, creating realistic-looking fake videos, known as deepfakes, has become more common. These can be made to appear as if an individual is doing or saying things they never actually did, contributing to the spread of misinformation.
• Social engineering: This involves manipulating people into breaking normal security procedures and sharing sensitive information. For example, someone might be tricked into sharing login details or personal videos.

It’s important to note that distributing private content without consent is illegal in many jurisdictions and can have serious legal consequences. Platforms typically have policies against non-consensual content and use various measures to prevent such leaks from spreading, including content moderation tools and legal action against the distributors.

Featured image credit: Drakerelated.com