{"id":59686,"date":"2024-11-01T08:34:44","date_gmt":"2024-11-01T07:34:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/?p=59686"},"modified":"2024-11-01T08:34:44","modified_gmt":"2024-11-01T07:34:44","slug":"microsoft-vs-google-cloud-battle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/2024\/11\/01\/microsoft-vs-google-cloud-battle\/","title":{"rendered":"Microsoft vs. Google: A battle renewed over cloud dominance"},"content":{"rendered":"
Microsoft and Google are back at each other’s throats. This time, the fight is over cloud services, and it’s getting personal. Microsoft recently accused Google of running “shadow campaigns” to discredit its cloud business. The software giant revealed that Google was behind the newly formed Open Cloud Coalition<\/a> just hours before its official announcement.<\/p>\n According to Microsoft<\/a>, Google has taken steps to undermine its reputation with regulators and the public. Rima Alaily, Microsoft\u2019s deputy general counsel, described Google\u2019s actions as a coordinated effort to “discredit Microsoft with competition authorities and policymakers.” Google allegedly went so far as to recruit smaller European cloud providers to be the public face of the new organization, all while masking its own involvement.<\/p>\n The Open Cloud Coalition was established following Google’s unsuccessful attempts to stop a settlement between Microsoft and the Cloud Infrastructure Services Providers in Europe (CISPE). Earlier this year, CISPE<\/a> dropped its EU complaint about Microsoft\u2019s licensing practices for Azure after Microsoft agreed to let European cloud providers offer Microsoft apps on their local cloud infrastructure. Microsoft claims that Google offered CISPE members cash and credits to oppose the settlement\u2014an allegation Google hasn’t publicly addressed.<\/p>\n The core of Google\u2019s argument against Microsoft lies in what it sees as anticompetitive practices designed to lock users into Azure. Google claims Microsoft makes it difficult and expensive for companies to migrate their existing Windows Server licenses to other cloud providers. This is a critical issue for businesses transitioning from on-premises infrastructure to the cloud. Microsoft, on the other hand, maintains that if companies choose to use their Windows Server licenses on Azure, it’s entirely fair. They see no reason to offer discounts or incentives for businesses wanting to migrate those licenses elsewhere.<\/p>\n This conflict has come at a time when Google is still trailing behind Amazon and Microsoft in the cloud market. Despite a leadership change over five years ago, Google remains a distant third. Facing over 20 antitrust investigations related to its search, advertising, and app store practices, Google appears eager to shape cloud regulations in its favor.<\/p>\nAntitrust tensions<\/h2>\n