{"id":62944,"date":"2025-01-07T09:56:05","date_gmt":"2025-01-07T08:56:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/?p=62944"},"modified":"2025-01-07T11:10:23","modified_gmt":"2025-01-07T10:10:23","slug":"intel-stock-slips-another-2-9-percent-can-it-bounce-back-from-a-57-percent-slide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/2025\/01\/07\/intel-stock-slips-another-2-9-percent-can-it-bounce-back-from-a-57-percent-slide\/","title":{"rendered":"Intel stock slips another 2.9%: Can it bounce back from a 57% slide?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Intel (INTC) stock was down by 2.9% as of 3 p.m. ET Monday, amid broader market gains where the S&P 500 rose by 0.5% and the Nasdaq Composite increased by 1%. The decline is attributed to a Wall Street Journal article published late Friday highlighting the company’s competitive struggles.<\/p>\n

Intel’s stock declines again<\/h2>\n

Intel’s issues are more severe than previously understood. It noted the company’s declining market share in semiconductors and challenges to traditional profit sources. Intel faces robust competition from disruptive innovators like Nvidia, rising competitors such as AMD, and smaller challengers. Additionally, Intel is under pressure from Microsoft, a crucial partner in its personal and business computing sectors. Mims pointed out that AMD surpassed Intel in sales in the vital data center segment last quarter.<\/p>\n

While focusing on the chip design business, the performance of Intel’s fabrication segment is critical for its stock valuation. Intel ranks as the world’s third-largest chip fabrication company, trailing Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company and Samsung. However, Intel’s fabrication performance lags significantly behind TSMC’s, as the company has missed key benchmarks. Intel chose to bypass its 20A fabrication node, and initial indications regarding its 18A process node are not promising. This situation poses a substantial challenge as the 18A node was central to Intel’s fabrication strategy under former CEO Pat Gelsinger.<\/p>\n

\n

Which chip stock to buy: Intel, AMD or Qualcomm?<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

Consequently, Intel’s stock has declined by approximately 57% over the past year. Although its current valuation may present potential for recovery, regaining investor confidence will require Intel to articulate a credible strategy and demonstrate effective execution.<\/p>\n

The technical analysis of Intel\u2019s stock indicates a period of consolidation. The stock closed at $20.56, slightly above its 20-day moving average of $20.25, indicating bullish potential yet lacking clear upward momentum. The stock has tracked sideways since August, between $19 and $24, reflecting a lack of directional strength. The Relative Strength Index (RSI) stands at 45.92, indicating bearish momentum is stronger than bullish momentum.<\/p>\n

Recent trading patterns suggest resistance levels around the $20 to $22 price range, as indicated by high trading volumes. Analysts believe that significant upward movement will require a shift in investor sentiment within this range, which remains unlikely due to ongoing uncertainties regarding Intel’s fundamentals.<\/p>\n

Moreover, the latest price action suggests that Intel\u2019s stock is set for continued consolidation, as reflected in its Bollinger Bands. The price resides within a narrow range of $19.25 to $21.25, with expectations of steady movement until the announcement of the next earnings report.<\/p>\n

The company’s third-quarter results showed a revenue drop to $13.28 billion, marking a 6% year-over-year decline and leading to an anticipated loss for the fiscal year. The forward consensus estimate for Intel’s fourth-quarter earnings per share is projected at negative $0.22 on a GAAP basis.<\/p>\n

Despite the challenges, Intel is implementing cost-cutting and productivity measures that could aid recovery in the future. Additionally, improvements in inventory metrics signal potential for recovery; Intel\u2019s inventory decreased from $13.2 billion to $12.06 billion, with days of inventory outstanding dropping from over 150 days to approximately 94 days.<\/p>\n

The once-mighty chip king has lost 57% over the year, and it\u2019s not just a \u201cmarket phase.\u201d AMD\u2019s eating its lunch in data centers, Nvidia\u2019s flexing AI dominance, and TSMC\u2019s miles ahead in fabrication tech. Intel\u2019s 18A process is supposed to be its lifeline, but early signs? Not great. Recovery needs more than cost cuts and \u201cpotential improvements\u201d\u2014it needs actual wins. Right now, this stock\u2019s just trading sideways between $19\u2013$24, stuck like it\u2019s in a tech purgatory.<\/p>\n

Can it bounce back? Sure, if<\/em> they pull a miracle in fabrication or stop bleeding market share. But that RSI of 45? It\u2019s screaming bearish vibes louder than Intel execs hyping their next-gen node. Investors hoping for a rally might want to wait until earnings hit or new leadership magic kicks in.<\/p>\n

\n

Disclaimer:<\/strong>\u00a0The content of this article is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as investment advice. We do not endorse any specific investment strategies or make recommendations regarding the purchase or sale of any securities.<\/p>\n

Featured image credit: <\/strong>Rubaitul Azad\/Unsplash<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Intel (INTC) stock was down by 2.9% as of 3 p.m. ET Monday, amid broader market gains where the S&P 500 rose by 0.5% and the Nasdaq Composite increased by 1%. The decline is attributed to a Wall Street Journal article published late Friday highlighting the company’s competitive struggles. Intel’s stock declines again Intel’s issues […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":584,"featured_media":62970,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":{"format":"standard","override":[{"template":"5","layout":"right-sidebar","sidebar":"default-sidebar","second_sidebar":"default-sidebar","share_position":"float","share_float_style":"share-normal","show_share_counter":"1","show_view_counter":"1","show_featured":"1","show_post_meta":"1","show_post_author":"1","show_post_author_image":"1","show_post_date":"1","post_date_format":"default","post_date_format_custom":"Y\/m\/d","show_post_category":"1","show_post_reading_time":"0","post_reading_time_wpm":"300","post_calculate_word_method":"str_word_count","zoom_button_out_step":"2","zoom_button_in_step":"3","show_post_tag":"1","number_popup_post":"1","show_author_box":"0","show_post_related":"1","show_inline_post_related":"0"}],"image_override":[{"single_post_thumbnail_size":"no-crop","single_post_gallery_size":"crop-715"}],"trending_post_position":"meta","trending_post_label":"Trending","sponsored_post_label":"Sponsored by","disable_ad":"0","subtitle":"Recent trading patterns suggest resistance levels around the $20 to $22 price range, as indicated by high trading volumes"},"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":{"view_counter_number":"0","share_counter_number":"0","like_counter_number":"0","dislike_counter_number":"0"},"footnotes":""},"categories":[118,343],"tags":[2610,586,1491],"coauthors":[9895],"class_list":["post-62944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","category-finance","tag-featured","tag-intel","tag-stock-market"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/584"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62944"}],"version-history":[{"count":"3","href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62944\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":62972,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62944\/revisions\/62972"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/62970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62944"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dataconomy.ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=62944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}